A geofence is a virtual boundary defined around a real-world geographic area. When a tracked object (a phone, a truck, a piece of farm equipment) crosses that boundary, something triggers: a push notification, a dispatch alert, a compliance log entry, an irrigation valve.
Most database problems are fixable. A slow query gets an index. A hot table gets partitioned. A node runs out of memory and you add another. The feedback loop is tight enough that you can experiment your way to a better configuration without touching application code or migrating data.
The last couple of posts in this series described navigation algorithms: robot vacuums covering a living room floor, then self-driving taxis doing the same at city scale. In that second post, I mentioned that Waymo vehicles sweep lidar continuously to sense the road around them. That’s lidar as a real-time perception tool. There’s another side to it: aerial terrain surveys that produce large static datasets, published and publicly available, and queryable with SQL.
Having a shared vocabulary across database, software, and infrastructure teams is critical when working together to tune latency issues. I’ve been in many incident rooms where the only report is “the application is slow” and had to unwind a series of questions: What do you mean by slow? Where do you see this? What parts are slow? If everyone in the room had read Enberg’s Latency, solving these kinds of incidents would be much faster.
In my previous post on routing, I used Dijkstra’s algorithm without much discussion of alternatives. The Dijkstra algorithm works for network routing, and for many problems it is the right choice. But pgRouting also ships with pgr_aStar, an implementation of the A* algorithm that can find the same shortest path while exploring fewer edges. The difference comes down to one thing: a heuristic that tells the algorithm which direction to look.
Vacuum robots and self-driving taxi robots navigate physical spaces and avoid obstacles. That’s a super broad characterization. The more interesting question is why everything else about them is so different.
A developer asked me recently which open data sources he could use for real-time traffic in his application. The list is shorter than he expected, and the main reason is licensing.
Query optimization is a critical aspect of database performance tuning. While YugabyteDB’s YSQL API provides powerful tools for analyzing query performance through EXPLAIN plans, sometimes we need to experiment with different indexing strategies without the overhead of actually creating the indexes. This is where HypoPG comes in handy.
In 2018, I wrote about using SQL functions to generate random test data in MySQL. While that approach served its purpose, the landscape of test data generation has evolved significantly. Today, I want to share my experience with using the Faker library, which has become my go-to tool for creating realistic test datasets.
In my previous post on pgRouting, I showed how to run shortest-path queries directly inside PostgreSQL. That approach works well when your road data is already in Postgres and your network is moderate-sized. But what happens when you need live traffic data, global coverage, or routing at thousands of queries per second? That is where external routing APIs and dedicated routing engines come in.