Data Migration

Migrating to YugabyteDB offers significant advantages in terms of high availability, global distribution, and horizontal scalability—features essential for managing modern database workloads. However, data migration can be a complex process, particularly when transforming your schema definition. Differences in datatype support, query syntax, and core features across systems can complicate the transformation.

One of the challenges is dealing with reserved keywords in the source schema that cannot be directly used in the target system. This can require changes not only in the database schema during transformation but also in application code and related tooling.

A database transformation and migration project takes solid planning and testing. I’ve found that three common changes required when transforming a SQL Server database to YugabyteDB YSQL are related to syntax, performance, and stored procedures. These will get you started on your transformation project.

Syntax

Transforming a schema from MS SQL to YugabyteDB requires some minor syntax changes. This is true for any cross-database transformation. The YugabyteDB YSQL API utilizes PostgreSQL syntax.

Math… the universal language. Timestamps, not so much.

The way we decide to denote date and time differs across both computer languages and human languages. The format also differs across implementations of SQL. For example, Oracle and Postgres allow very different formats to be entered in the timestamp data type.

Oracle allows a wide variety of punctuation in dates: hyphens, slashes, commas, periods, colons. Postgres supports a more limited list.